« Previous
Next »
British Journal of Medical & Surgical Urology
Volume 5, Issue 1
, Pages 4-10
, January 2012
Medical students’ exposure to Urology in the undergraduate curriculum, a web based survey
References
- . Undergraduate urology: a survey of current provisions and guidelines for a core curriculum. BJU International. 2002;89(4):327–330
- . Morbity statistics from general practice. Fourth National Study 1991–2. London: Royal College of General Practitioners, Office of Population Censuses, and Department of Health; 1995;
- General Medical Council. Tomorrow's Doctors. London. GMC; 2003.
- Medical student entry into general surgery increases with early exposure to surgery and to surgeons. Current Surgery. 2006;63(6):397–400
- . Recruitment in urology: a national survey in the UK. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. 2004;86(3):186–189
- . Women and medicine. The future. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2009;
- . The loss of formal undergraduate teaching time in urology could cripple the growth of our specialty. The Journal of Urology. 1966;95(2):133–134
- . The current status of medical student urological education in the United States. The Journal of Urology. 2008;179(3):1087–1090[discussion 1090–1]
- . Final report of the education and training regulation policy review: recommendations and options for future regulation of education and training. 2010;Available from: http://www.gmc-uk.org/Patel_review.pdf_39254211.pdf [September 2011]
- . The urological foot soldier: are we equipping our foundation-year doctors?. Bulletin of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. 2010;92(8):284–287
- . Foundation programme oversubscription. BMJ Careers. 2010;(December):http://careers.bmj.com/careers/advice/view-article.html?id=20001686#
- . Surgery in the undergraduate curriculum report by the Education and Professional Development Committee of SARS. Bulletin of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. 2005;87(4):138–139
- . Women in surgery: do we really understand the deterrents?. Archives of Surgery (Chicago, Ill.: 1960). 2006;141(4):405–407[discussion 407–8]
PII: S1875-9742(11)00183-2
doi: 10.1016/j.bjmsu.2011.10.005
© 2011 British Association of Urological Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
British Journal of Medical & Surgical Urology
Volume 5, Issue 1
, Pages 4-10
, January 2012
