« Previous
Next »
British Journal of Medical & Surgical Urology
Volume 3, Issue 5
, Pages 198-203
, September 2010
Analgesia for shock wave lithotripsy
References
- . The opioid-sparing effect of diclofenac sodium in outpatient extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). J Clin Anesth. 1993;5:141–144
- Choosing the correct pain relief for extracorporeal lithotripsy. Br J Urol. 1994;74:302–307
- . Comparison of three analgesics for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2002;36:281–285
- Analgesia during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: fentanyl citrate versus parecoxib sodium. J Endourol. 2008;22:623–626
- . Lornoxicam in extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy; comparison with tenoxicam and placebo in terms of analgesic consumption. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2008;42:143–147
- Randomized comparison of efficacy of paracetamol, lornoxicam, and tramadol representing three different groups of analgesics for pain control in extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. J Endourol. 2010;[Epub ahead of print]
- . A comparison of anaesthetic techniques for shock wave lithotripsy: the use of a remifentanil infusion alone compared to intermittent fentanyl boluses combined with a low dose propofol infusion. Anaesthesia. 2002;57:877–881
- . The analgesic effect of inhalational Entonox for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Urol Res. 2007;35:331–334
- . Target-controlled infusion of remifentanil or fentanyl during extra-corporeal shock-wave lithotripsy. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2005;22:56–61
- . A comparison of sedation with dexmedetomidine or propofol during shockwave lithotripsy: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:114–119
- . Dexmedetomidine causes prolonged recovery when compared with midazolam/fentanyl combination in outpatient shock wave lithotripsy. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2008;1–7
- Use of patient-controlled analgesia with alfentanil for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Clin Anesth. 1995;7:205–210
- . Patient controlled analgesia for shock wave lithotripsy: the effect of self-administered alfentanil on pain intensity and drug requirement. J Urol. 1996;155:43–47
- . Use of patient-controlled analgesia in extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. Br J Urol. 1997;79:848–851
- Appropriate method of administration of propofol, fentanyl, and ketamine for patient-controlled sedation and analgesia during extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy. J Anesth. 2000;14:68–72
- . Patient-controlled analgesia during SWL treatments. J Endourol. 2001;15:465–471
- . A comparison of patient-controlled sedation using either remifentanil or remifentanil-propofol for shock wave lithotripsy. Anesth Analg. 2001;93:1227–1232
- . Analgesia for shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol. 2002;167:1613–1615
- Remifentanil as a single drug for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a comparison of infusion doses in terms of analgesic potency and side effects. Anesth Analg. 2005;101:365–370
- . Anesthesiologist-controlled versus patient-controlled propofol sedation for shockwave lithotripsy. Can J Anaesth. 2006;53:449–455
- . Effect of topical eutectic mixture of local anesthetics on pain response and analgesic requirement during lithotripsy procedures. Anesth Analg. 1994;79:506–511
- Four analgesic techniques for shockwave lithotripsy: eutectic mixture local anesthetic is a good alternative. J Endourol. 2003;17:3–6
- . Effectiveness of eutectic mixture of local anesthetic cream and occlusive dressing with low dosage of fentanyl for pain control during shockwave lithotripsy. J Endourol. 2005;19:589–594
- . Comparison of three analgesic regimens for pain control during shockwave lithotripsy using Dornier Delta Compact lithotripter: a randomized clinical trial. J Endourol. 2007;21:578–582
- . Local anesthesia with 20-mL prilocaine infiltration: the ultimate point for analgesia during shockwave lithotripsy?. J Endourol. 2008;22:883–887
- . Comparison of three analgesic treatment protocols for pain management during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Urol Int. 2009;82:276–279
- . Critique of the Dornier HM3 lithotripter as a clinical algesimeter. Pain. 1990;40:255–265
PII: S1875-9742(10)00092-3
doi: 10.1016/j.bjmsu.2010.04.001
© 2010 British Association of Urological Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
British Journal of Medical & Surgical Urology
Volume 3, Issue 5
, Pages 198-203
, September 2010
