British Journal of Medical & Surgical Urology
Volume 3, Issue 1 , Pages 15-21, January 2010

Do urologists adhere to the British National Formulary (BNF) guidelines?—Results of a postal questionnaire survey

  • Sailaja Pisipati

      Affiliations

    • Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, United Kingdom
    • Current address: South West Peninsula Deanery, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro TR1 3UD, United Kingdom.
  • ,
  • Amy Gilbert

      Affiliations

    • Manchester Medical School, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Ian Pearce

      Affiliations

    • Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, United Kingdom
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of Urology, Royal Cornwall Hospital, 44 Pendeen House, Truro TR1 3UD, United Kingdom. Tel.: +44 01872250000; fax: +44 01872252417.

Received 17 January 2009; received in revised form 14 September 2009; accepted 25 September 2009.

Summary 

Aim

Information in the British National Formulary (BNF) is obtained from a wide range of sources. BNF contains three guidelines directly pertinent to urological practice. We set out to determine urologists’ adherence to these guidelines.

Methods

A standard questionnaire was sent to each urological unit in the UK (n=191). The three guidelines relate to:

(1)Prevention of endocarditis in patients undergoing urological interventions.

(2)Use of iodine containing contrast media in patients taking metformin.

(3)Use of anti-androgens in conjunction with GnRH analogues.

Results

111 (58%) completed questionnaires were returned. Adherence rate was 28%, 34% and 17% respectively for each of the above guidelines. The adherence rate was 50%, 50% and 14% by specialist registrars in contrast to 22%, 27% and 16% by consultants. Adherence decreased as the number of years of experience in urology increased, from 36.3% at 5 years to 26.3% at 20 years.

Conclusion

The overall adherence of urologists to BNF guidelines is low (26.3%), with adherence being higher for registrars. The longer a urologist had been in urology, the lower the adherence. In the current era of evidence-based practice, we recommend that these guidelines are revisited, perhaps by the British Association of Urological Surgeons or National Institute for Clinical Excellence.

Keywords: Adherence, Urologists, BNF guidelines

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1875-9742(09)00159-1

doi:10.1016/j.bjmsu.2009.09.027

British Journal of Medical & Surgical Urology
Volume 3, Issue 1 , Pages 15-21, January 2010