« Previous
Next »
British Journal of Medical & Surgical Urology
Volume 3, Issue 2
, Pages 72-74
, March 2010
Presumed expulsion of intrauterine contraceptive devices—Advice following ‘paradoxical pregnancy’
References
- . Long-acting reverisible contraception. 2005;http://www.nice.org.uk/pdf/CG030fullguideline.pdf [accessed August 11, 2009]
- . Uterine perforation on intrauterine device insertion: is the incidence higher than previously reported?. Contraception. 2003;67:53–56
- . Frameless versus classical intrauterine device for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(1):CD003282
- . Migration of an intrauterine contraceptive device into the sigmoid colon. Saudi Med J. 2009;30:561–563
- . Colonoscopic retrieval of a lost intrauterine contraceptive device: a case report and review of articles. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2005;10:261–265
- . Surgical management of intra-abdominal mislocated intrauterine devices. Contraception. 2007;75:96–100
- . IUCD appendicitis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003;110:102–104
- . Intravesical migration of intrauterine device. J Urol. 1992;147:132–134
- . Intravesical stone formation on intrauterine contraceptive device. Int Urol Nephrol. 2004;36:345–348
- . Inadvertent vesicular placement of a vaginal contraceptive ring presenting as persistent cystitis. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:470–472
- Faculty of sexual & reproductive healthcare clinical guidance. Clinical Effectiveness Unit; 2007;http://www.ffprhc.org.uk/admin/uploads/CEUGuidanceIntrauterineContraceptionNov07.pdf [accessed August 11, 2009]
PII: S1875-9742(09)00126-8
doi: 10.1016/j.bjmsu.2009.08.003
© 2009 British Association of Urological Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
British Journal of Medical & Surgical Urology
Volume 3, Issue 2
, Pages 72-74
, March 2010
