British Journal of Medical & Surgical Urology
Volume 2, Issue 4 , Pages 147-153, July 2009

The new BAUS Section of Academic Urology: A survey of the urological community

  • A.W. Nelson

      Affiliations

    • The Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Glasgow, UK
    • Glasgow Citywide Urology, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, United Kingdom
    • Both authors contributed equally to this work.
  • ,
  • I. Ahmad

      Affiliations

    • The Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Glasgow, UK
    • Glasgow Citywide Urology, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, United Kingdom
    • Both authors contributed equally to this work.
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: The Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Garscube Estate, Switchback Road, Glasgow G61 1BD, UK.
  • ,
  • R.S. Pickard

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
  • ,
  • H.Y. Leung

      Affiliations

    • The Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Glasgow, UK
    • Glasgow Citywide Urology, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, United Kingdom

Received 5 January 2009; received in revised form 15 April 2009; accepted 17 April 2009.

Summary 

Objective

In 2007 the Section of Academic Urology was established as the fifth subspecialty section of the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS). We conducted a survey of urologists and scientists involved in urological research in order to see how the new section could best serve the needs of the academic and clinical community.

Materials and methods

A ten-part questionnaire was distributed to members of BAUS and BURST (British Urological Researchers in Training) via invitation, email and face-to-face contact. Results were collated using internet-based survey software.

Results

Fifty-eight surveys were returned of which fifty-three (91.4%) were complete; forty-one respondents were career-grade clinicians, forty-six respondents were clinicians with prior research experience, forty respondents indicated a high level of interest in joining the academic section. Establishment of clinical research networks, face-to-face networking, contribution to scientific research in urology and provision of academic training emerged as priority areas for the section to address.

Conclusions

Our survey population is a young and highly qualified group, with previous research experience and a desire to conduct further research. Priority areas for the new section to meet were highlighted, however a larger survey population, including non-clinical scientists would help to better establish the views of the wider urological community.

Keywords: Survey, Academic, Urology

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1875-9742(09)00068-8

doi:10.1016/j.bjmsu.2009.04.003

British Journal of Medical & Surgical Urology
Volume 2, Issue 4 , Pages 147-153, July 2009