British Journal of Medical & Surgical Urology
Volume 2, Issue 3 , Pages 105-110, May 2009

Use and misuse of testicular ultrasound in routine clinical practice in a UK teaching hospital

Department of Urology, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham NG51PB, UK

Received 3 July 2008; received in revised form 1 December 2008; accepted 7 December 2008.

Summary 

Testicular ultrasound is a non-invasive and accurate investigation for testicular abnormalities. However, the majority of testicular problems are amenable to diagnosis by clinical examination alone. Testicular USS requests and reports generated over an 18-month period (03/2006 to 09/2007) at Nottingham City Hospital were examined to determine the indication for the test and the ultrasound findings. 2475 scans were performed: 576 were requested by urologists; 1899 by GPs and other hospital specialists. The most common findings were a completely normal scan (825) and epididymal cyst (637). In the majority of cases, the ultrasound scan was not necessary to make a diagnosis and added nothing to the findings at clinical examination. Correlations of ultrasound findings with the clinical reason for the test are presented in order to suggest suitable indications for this investigation. The total cost of testicular scans performed was around £200,000. It is estimated that at least £130,000 per year could be saved in a single hospital by avoiding unnecessary testicular scans. However, where the clinical findings are equivocal, ultrasound remains an excellent diagnostic tool.

Keywords: Testicle, Ultrasound, Testicular cancer, Testicular mass

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1875-9742(08)00147-X

doi:10.1016/j.bjmsu.2008.12.004

British Journal of Medical & Surgical Urology
Volume 2, Issue 3 , Pages 105-110, May 2009