British Journal of Medical & Surgical Urology
Volume 2, Issue 1 , Pages 22-26, January 2009

How quickly are we treating muscle invasive bladder cancer? Trends over a 17 year period

  • M. Mantle

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, Cornwall TR1 3LJ, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 1872 252562 fax: +44 1872 252417.
  • ,
  • A.J. Dickinson

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Derriford Hospital, Derriford Road, Plymouth, Devon PL6 8DH, UK
  • ,
  • M. Moody

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, North Devon District Hospital, Raleigh Park, Barnstaple, Devon EX31 4JB, UK
  • ,
  • R. Cox

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, Cornwall TR1 3LJ, UK

Received 23 August 2008; received in revised form 26 September 2008; accepted 5 October 2008.

Summary 

Objective

Our aim was to measure the time from presentation to definitive treatment for muscle invasive bladder cancer in the South West Region. This was compared with previous audits of waiting times over the past 17 years.

Methods

A retrospective survey was carried out in each of the hospitals in the South West Region, to assess the interval between referral and definitive treatment of all new cases of muscle invasive bladder cancer in 2006. This was compared to the same data for 1989, 1993 [Dickinson AJ, Howe K, Bedford C, Sanders T, Prentice A, Sibley GNA. A retrospective study of the investigation and management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer in the South West Region. BJU 1996;77:70–75] and 1999.

Results

A total of 153 patients were identified. 118 (77%) underwent immediate definitive treatment. Median delay to definitive treatment was 102 days, compared with 114, 96 and 101 days in 1989, 1993 and 1999 respectively. Median delay between TURBT and definitive treatment had increased to 70 days in 2006 compared with 55, 44 and 54 days in the previous years studied.

Conclusions

The waits for initial cystoscopy and TURBT, both of which are governed by cancer wait targets, have come down over the last 17 years. However the subsequent delay from TURBT to definitive treatment has lengthened with no change in total time to treatment. Reasons might include TURBT being used as the stop the clock treatment, delay surrounding an increase in tertiary referrals and a general increase in workload.

Keywords: Invasive bladder cancer, Treatment, Waiting time

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1875-9742(08)00098-0

doi:10.1016/j.bjmsu.2008.10.002

British Journal of Medical & Surgical Urology
Volume 2, Issue 1 , Pages 22-26, January 2009