British Journal of Medical & Surgical Urology
Volume 1, Issue 3 , Pages 139-141 , November 2008

Penile silicone pseudocarcinomatous epithelial hyperplasia; why bigger is not always better

  • Dan Magrill

      Affiliations

    • Andrology and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, St. George’s Hospital, London SW17 0QT, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: 9 Westmead, London SW15 5BH, UK. Tel.: +44 7801 801 789; fax: +44 20 8788 6003.
    • ,
  • Majid Shabbir

      Affiliations

    • Andrology and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, St. George’s Hospital, London SW17 0QT, UK
    • ,
  • Mo Belal

      Affiliations

    • Urology Department, Guy’s Hospital, SE1 9RT London, UK
    • ,
  • Declan Cahill

      Affiliations

    • Urology Department, Guy’s Hospital, SE1 9RT London, UK
    • ,
  • Ben Hughes

      Affiliations

    • Andrology and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, St. George’s Hospital, London SW17 0QT, UK
    • ,
  • Cathy Corbishley

      Affiliations

    • Andrology and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, St. George’s Hospital, London SW17 0QT, UK
    • ,
  • Nick Watkin

      Affiliations

    • Andrology and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, St. George’s Hospital, London SW17 0QT, UK
    • ,
  • Matthew Perry

      Affiliations

    • Andrology and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, St. George’s Hospital, London SW17 0QT, UK

Received 15 August 2008 ,Revised 20 August 2008 ,Accepted 24 August 2008.

References 

  1. Floyd MStJ, Cotter D. Corcoran. Penile bead implantation. Brit J Sex Med. 2007;30(3):16–17
  2. Wassermann RJ, Greenwald DP. Debilitating granuloma of the penis and scrotum. Ann Plast Surg. 1995;35(5):505–509
  3. Ciancio SJ, Coburn M. Penile salvage for squamous cell carcinoma associated with mineral oil injection. J Urology. 2000;164:1650

PII: S1875-9742(08)00074-8

doi: 10.1016/j.bjmsu.2008.08.004

British Journal of Medical & Surgical Urology
Volume 1, Issue 3 , Pages 139-141 , November 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution