The 3 ‘R's—Re-validation, re-licensing and re-certification: How will it affect urologists?

References 

1. Donaldson Sir L, Chief Medical Officer. Good doctors, safer patients. London: Department of Health; 2006.
2. Department of Health. Trust, assurance and safety—the regulation of health professionals in the 21st Century. London: Department of Health; 2007.
3. General Medical Council. Good medical practice. 4th ed. London: GMC; 2006. http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/good_medical_practice/.
4. Bridgewater B. Adult Cardiac Surgeons of North West England. Mortality data in adult cardiac surgery for named surgeons: retrospective examination of prospectively collected data on coronary artery surgery and aortic valve replacement. BMJ. 2005;330(March (7490)):506–510
   • CrossRef
5. Bridgewater B, Grayson AD, Brooks N, Grotte G, Fabri BM, Au J, et al. North West Quality Improvement Programme in Cardiac Interventions. Has the publication of cardiac surgery outcome data been associated with changes in practice in northwest England: an analysis of 25,730 patients undergoing CABG surgery under 30 surgeons over eight years. Heart. 2007;93(June (6)):744–748
6. Mason A, Goldacre MJ, Bettley G, Vale J, Joyce A. Using routine data to define clinical case-mix and compare hospital outcomes in urology. BJU Int. 2006;97:1145–1147
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
7. Sinclair AM, Pearce I, Bridgewater B. Using routine data to define clinical case-mix and compare hospital outcomes in urology. BJU Int. 2006;98:1121–11121
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
8. Choudhry NK, Fletcher RH, Soumerai SB. Systematic review: the relationship between clinical experience and quality of health care. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:260–273
9. Self-Education Self Assessment in Thoracic Surgery (SESATS). http://www.sesats.org/.
10. MORI Social Research Institute on behalf of the Department of Health. Attitudes to medical regulation and revalidation of doctors. Research among doctors and the general public. Research study conducted for the Department of Health. London: Department of Health; 2005. http://www.mori.com/polls/2005/pdf/doh.pdf.
11. Chisholm A, Askham J. What do you think of your doctor? A review of questionnaires for gathering patients’ feedback on their doctor. Oxford: Picker Institute; 2006;
12. Crossley J, Eiser C, Davies H. Children and their parents assessing the doctor–patient interaction: a rating system for doctors’ communication skills. Med Educ. 2005;39(August (8)):820–828
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
13. Crossley J, Davies H. Doctors’ consultations with children and their parents: a model of competencies, outcomes and confounding influences. Med Educ. 2005;39(8):807–819
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
14. Sinclair AM, Gunendran T, Anderson A, Bridgewater B, Pearce I. Revalidation in Urology. Validating a questionnaire to address the ‘Relationships with Patients’ aspect of ‘Good Medical Practice’. BAUS 2008. Poster No 50. Clinical Governance Section.
15. Urological Training Manual. Higher surgical training in urology: a guide for trainers and trainees in the UK and Ireland; 2003.
16. Lipner RS, Blank LL, Leas BF, Fortner GS. The value of patient and peer review ratings in recertification. Acad Med. 2002;77:564–566
17. Archer JC, Norcini J, Davies HA. Use of SPRAT for peer review of paediatricians in training. BMJ. 2005;330(7502):1251–1253
    • CrossRef